| 
                  
                     
                      | 
                          
                             
                              | 152 | THE 
                                ORIGIN OF ISLAM | LECT. |  |   
                      | stories of the prophets delivered in the Meccan period, 
                          we shall notice how often there occurs, in the appeals 
                          of the prophets, the phrase "Obey God and obey 
                          me". If we can read out of these stories indications 
                          of what was the situation in Mecca, we shall find hints 
                          also that the Prophet's opponents felt that his call 
                          to Islam implied a claim to obedience to himself. That 
                          was never really absent from his demands, and was in 
                          fact implied at any rate in his later conception of 
                          the position of a prophet. He was God's mouthpiece upon 
                          earth and the agent of His incontrovertible will. The 
                          demand for absolute obedience finds expression in viii. 
                          v. 24 (probably shortly after Badr): "O ye 
                          who have believed, respond to God and his Apostle when 
                          he calls to that which giveth you life. Know that God 
                          cometh between a man and his own heart." When, therefore, Muhammad came to close quarters with 
                          Christians it was bound to go with them as it had gone 
                          with the Jews. He might recognise Jesus as a prophet 
                          — as the greatest of previous prophets. He did that. 
                          But differences between the beliefs and practices of 
                          the Christians of that day, and the cardinal doctrines 
                          and practices which he inculcated, were bound to appear, 
                          some of which Muhammad could not accept or approve: 
                          and Christians, however far they might approve of some 
                          of his teachings, could not accept him as the presentday 
                          mouthpiece of God on earth whom it was their present 
                          duty absolutely to obey. Differences soon began to appear. Monasticism he had probably known of from |  | 
                  
                     
                      | 
                          
                             
                              | V | ATTITUDE 
                                TO CHRISTIANITY | 153 |  |   
                      | the first, and probably he approved of it. Any disapproval 
                          of it which he expresses, amounts merely to the declaration 
                          that it is not prescribed "We sent Noah and 
						Abraham and appointed the prophetic office and the Book 
						to be in the line of their descendants. Some of them 
						were guided aright, though many were evil-doers. Then We 
						caused our messengers to follow in their footsteps and 
						We caused Jesus son of Maryam to follow them,1 
						and gave to him the Gospel: and set in the hearts of 
						those who followed him kindness and mercy, and 
						monasticism 
                          (rahbaniyya) which they introduced for themselves, 
                          We not having prescribed it for them, except (as a means 
                          of) seeking the favour of God. They did not, however, 
                          manage it aright. Those of them who believed We gave 
                          their reward, but many of them were evil-doers" 
                          (lvii. v. 26 f.). Muhammad had already given an apocryphal account of 
                          the birth of Jesus, which, however, would hardly have 
                          been a stumbling-block to contemporary Christians. But 
                          while rating the Jews he stumbles upon an account of 
                          the death of Jesus which Christians of that time could 
                          not have accepted. "For their not fulfilling 
                          their covenant, for their unbelief in the signs of God, 
                          for their slaying the prophets unjustly, for their saying, 
                          'Our hearts are uncircumcised '—nay, God hath put a 
                          seal upon them for their unbelief, and they do not believe 
                          except a little—and for their unbelief in speaking against 
                          Maryam a grievous scandal and in saying, 'We have killed 
                          the Messiah Jesus son of Maryam, the messenger of God.' 
                          They did not kill him and did not crucify him, but he 
                          was |   
                      | 
 |  |